The “Descriptive Norm and Fraud Dynamics” model demonstrates how fraudulent behavior can either proliferate or be contained within non-hierarchical organizations, such as peer networks, through social influence taking the form of a descriptive norm. This model expands on the fraud triangle theory, which posits that an individual must concurrently possess a financial motive, perceive an opportunity, and hold a pro-fraud attitude to engage in fraudulent activities (red agent). In the absence of any of these elements, the individual will act honestly (green agent).
The model explores variations in a descriptive norm mechanism, ranging from local distorted knowledge to global perfect knowledge. In the case of local distorted knowledge, agents primarily rely on information from their first-degree colleagues. This knowledge is often distorted because agents are slow to update their empirical expectations, which are only partially revised after one-to-one interactions. On the other end of the spectrum, local perfect knowledge is achieved by incorporating a secondary source of information into the agents’ decision-making process. Here, accurate information provided by an observer is used to update empirical expectations.
The model shows that the same variation of the descriptive norm mechanism could lead to varying aggregate fraud levels across different fraud categories. Two empirically measured norm sensitivity distributions associated with different fraud categories can be selected into the model to see the different aggregate outcomes.
Release Notes
Initial release
This is the initial release of the model as used for the full paper contribution entitled “Combining Vignette Surveys with Agent-Based Modeling: Insights on Fraud Dynamics with Empirically Calibrated Norm Sensitivities” presented at the 19th Annual Social Simulation Conference (16-20 September 2024), Cracow, September 16. The associated manuscript for the conference proceedings is currently under review.
Related models
The “Descriptive Norm and Fraud Dynamics” model re-implements and extends the conceptual benchmark model variant of Davis and Pesch’s “Fraud Dynamics and Controls” model (2013).
The present extension implements a threshold model inspired by Granovetter (1978) and Bicchieri and Funcke (2018).
Variation of the descriptive norm mechanism uses the parameter [beta] and the formula for calculating empirical expectations proposed by Bicchieri and Funcke (2018).
Getting started
Install NetLogo if you haven’t already. You can download it from the NetLogo website.
Download the model.
Navigate to the “code” folder.
Open the model file in NetLogo.
Read the short instructions in the “Info” tab.
Select parameters and dataset in the “Interface” tab.
Press the “Setup” button to initialize the model.
Press the “Go” button to start the simulation.
Associated Publications
Eckert, Alexandra, Christian Stindt, and Matthias Meyer. 2024. “Combining Vignette Surveys with Agent-Based Modeling: Insights on Fraud Dynamics with Empirically Calibrated Norm Sensitivities.” Conference presentation at the 19th Annual Social Simulation Conference (16-20 September 2024), Cracow, September 16.
Descriptive Norm and Fraud Dynamics 1.0.0
Submitted byAlexandra EckertPublished Jan 07, 2025
Last modified Jan 08, 2025
The “Descriptive Norm and Fraud Dynamics” model demonstrates how fraudulent behavior can either proliferate or be contained within non-hierarchical organizations, such as peer networks, through social influence taking the form of a descriptive norm. This model expands on the fraud triangle theory, which posits that an individual must concurrently possess a financial motive, perceive an opportunity, and hold a pro-fraud attitude to engage in fraudulent activities (red agent). In the absence of any of these elements, the individual will act honestly (green agent).
The model explores variations in a descriptive norm mechanism, ranging from local distorted knowledge to global perfect knowledge. In the case of local distorted knowledge, agents primarily rely on information from their first-degree colleagues. This knowledge is often distorted because agents are slow to update their empirical expectations, which are only partially revised after one-to-one interactions. On the other end of the spectrum, local perfect knowledge is achieved by incorporating a secondary source of information into the agents’ decision-making process. Here, accurate information provided by an observer is used to update empirical expectations.
The model shows that the same variation of the descriptive norm mechanism could lead to varying aggregate fraud levels across different fraud categories. Two empirically measured norm sensitivity distributions associated with different fraud categories can be selected into the model to see the different aggregate outcomes.
Release Notes
Initial release
This is the initial release of the model as used for the full paper contribution entitled “Combining Vignette Surveys with Agent-Based Modeling: Insights on Fraud Dynamics with Empirically Calibrated Norm Sensitivities” presented at the 19th Annual Social Simulation Conference (16-20 September 2024), Cracow, September 16. The associated manuscript for the conference proceedings is currently under review.
Related models
The “Descriptive Norm and Fraud Dynamics” model re-implements and extends the conceptual benchmark model variant of Davis and Pesch’s “Fraud Dynamics and Controls” model (2013).
The present extension implements a threshold model inspired by Granovetter (1978) and Bicchieri and Funcke (2018).
Variation of the descriptive norm mechanism uses the parameter [beta] and the formula for calculating empirical expectations proposed by Bicchieri and Funcke (2018).
Getting started
Install NetLogo if you haven’t already. You can download it from the NetLogo website.
Download the model.
Navigate to the “code” folder.
Open the model file in NetLogo.
Read the short instructions in the “Info” tab.
Select parameters and dataset in the “Interface” tab.
Press the “Setup” button to initialize the model.
Press the “Go” button to start the simulation.
Cite this Model
Alexandra Eckert, Matthias Meyer, Christian Stindt (2025, January 07). “Descriptive Norm and Fraud Dynamics” (Version 1.0.0). CoMSES Computational Model Library. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.25937/gqxp-7311
Associated Publication(s)
Eckert, Alexandra, Christian Stindt, and Matthias Meyer. 2024. “Combining Vignette Surveys with Agent-Based Modeling: Insights on Fraud Dynamics with Empirically Calibrated Norm Sensitivities.” Conference presentation at the 19th Annual Social Simulation Conference (16-20 September 2024), Cracow, September 16.
References
Bicchieri, Cristina, and Andreas Funcke. 2018. “Norm Change: Trendsetters and Social Structure.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 85 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2018.0002.
Davis, Jon S., and Heather L. Pesch. 2013. “Fraud Dynamics and Controls in Organizations.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 (6–7): 469–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.005.
Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 1420–43.
Create an Open Code Badge that links to this model more info
This website uses cookies and Google Analytics to help us track user engagement and improve our site. If
you'd like to know more information about what data we collect and why, please see
our data privacy policy. If you continue to use this site, you consent to
our use of cookies.